Aug. 17,
2007
The LES
Administrative Board held its regular monthly meeting Aug. 17 at the Lincoln
Electric Building. Items from the meeting, as well as other pertinent
information, include:
For 20th Consecutive Year, Survey Shows LES Rates Among Nation’s Lowest
For the 20th consecutive year, a nationwide study of 106 cities ranks the
rates paid by Lincoln Electric System (LES) customers among the lowest in the
country, Rich Andrysik, utilities manager of the Rates, Forecasting and Load
Research department in Consumer Services, told the LES Administrative Board
Aug. 17.
The
annual survey compared electric bills at various usage levels and revealed
LES’ electric costs are among the lowest for all classes of customers. LES
rates remain unchanged since the last survey was conducted one year ago. The
last rate change was a 4.5 percent rate increase implemented in February 2006.
The bills for the other 105 utilities reflected electric rates that were in
effect on Jan. 1, 2007. The survey revealed LES’ bills ranked 9th lowest,
overall. Residential electric bills were 7th lowest and commercial and
industrial bills, 11th lowest.
Residential customers using 1,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) pay $60.95, or 41
percent less, than the survey average of $102.86. The city in the survey with
the highest rate was Cambridge, Mass., where the rate for the cost of
electricity for this category was $201.15, and the lowest was Boise, Idaho, at
$51.54.
LES industrial customers using 1,000 kilowatts (kW) and 400,000 kWh pay
$20,680, or 36 percent less, than the survey average of $32,344. The survey
found the rates in Bridgeport and New Haven, Conn., are highest in this
category at $74,745, while Boise, Idaho, had the lowest rate at $11,475.
Regionally, compared to seven Midwestern cities, the electric rates in Lincoln
are the lowest in four of 12 categories. Cities in the regional comparison
include: Omaha; Kansas City, Mo.; Kansas City, Kan.; Wichita, Kan.; Colorado
Springs, Colo.; Minneapolis, Minn.; and Des Moines, Iowa.
Andrysik said the 2007 rate study revealed that 55 percent of the utilities
included reported rate increases. Even with the February 2006 rate increase,
the rates paid today by LES customers are just 28.5 percent higher than rates
charged twenty years ago, while the Consumer Price Index has increased by
almost 84 percent since that time.
Andrysik said LES’ low rates can be attributed to the following:
Low operating costs at power plants supplying electricity, which account for
about 70 percent of LES' costs to provide electric service to customers. A
diverse mix of efficient energy sources, using coal, water, renewable, oil
and gas, helps keep energy production costs low.
LES power plants have operated well, supplying consistent power with few
repair costs.
Nine large, local business customers participating in a program that helps
reduce power use at peak times, which also helps keep LES' costs low.
Combined, the businesses in aggregate provided about 3 megawatts of energy
reduction when needed.
LES has low-cost financing because bonds and commercial paper notes receive
high ratings, enabling LES to borrow money at lower interest costs. In 2005,
LES’ $625 million in electric revenue bonds were rated: Fitch, AA; Standard
and Poor’s, AA+; and Moody’s, Aa2.
Demand, Energy Lower in Long-Range Forecast
Slower economic and population growth has resulted in a slightly lower
forecast of customer demand and energy use, said Rich Andrysik, utilities
manager of the Rates, Forecasting and Load Research department in Consumer
Services, at Friday’s (8/17) meeting of the Administrative Board.
The annual long-range forecast of Lincoln-area load shows the projected
increase in energy use for 2005-2015 at 2.1 percent, down from a 2.5 percent
annual increase expected last year. Customer demand also was slightly lower at
1.8 percent, down from a 2.1 percent annual increase in 2006 projections.
Customer growth is anticipated to increase about 2,000 and is projected to
trend lower in the future, Andrysik said.
While residential and commercial classes continue to grow, the analysis found
that the number of industrial and government customers has been flat since
2000.
The effect of weather on demand projects a peak of 787 megawatts (MW) in 2007,
based on 30 years of historic data. Applying the hottest year to the forecast
could result in a peak of 832 MW this year.
The Rates, Forecasting and Load Research department makes the annual forecast
using a highly-detailed econometric model that is used by Power Supply,
Financial Services and Engineering. Variables in the forecast include
population, weather, income, unemployment and the price of electricity.
Overhead to Underground Projects Completed, Slated
Overhead lines along three streets were placed underground in 2006, and 2007
and 2008 will each see lines buried along two streets, reported Dan Pudenz,
vice president of Engineering.
The program was created in response to the Lincoln-Lancaster County
Comprehensive Plan that states, “within the City of Lincoln, wherever feasible
and affordable, implement a phased program to relocate overhead utility lines
underground.” About $500,000 has been budgeted to bury overhead lines along
main arterials since 2006, when the program began.
Last year, overhead lines were buried along the following streets:
Vine St., 40th-52nd
K St., 10th-11th
27th St., Everett-South
Slated for completion in 2007:
Vine St., 66th-72nd
South St., 57th-66th
Projects identified for 2008 include the following:
70th St., O-Vine
South St., 66th-70th
Areas were selected based on the age of poles and lines, street
classification, traffic speed and volume, whether the street is an entrance
corridor, distance of poles from the curb, property owner disruption, current
and future right-of-way issues, coordination with other utilities, long-range
street, water and sewer plans and location of arterial street rehabilitation,
water, or sewer projects.
Other Reports
|
July 2007 |
July 2006 |
Change |
|
Number of Customers |
|
125,829 |
124,360 |
+1,469
(+1.2%) |
|
Retail Electricity Use (MWh) |
|
326,105 |
332,916 |
+6,811
(-2.0%) |
|
12-Month Average Outage Time/Customer
(minutes) |
|
24.2 |
18.6 |
+5.6 |
Top